Spam Filtering Choices

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
#1 Sun, 11/16/2008 - 06:29

Spam Filtering Choices

I was wondering if it might be a good idea to give more spam filtering options, like choosing between SpamAssassin & dspam. Some people swear by dspam, others by SpamAssassin . Or other spam assassin channels. I recently implemented OpenProtect's SpamAssassin sa-update channel, and it seems to be working wonders. I keep bringing up spam topics because it has become a huge issue on my servers. Would be nice to have something out of the box that took care of spam effectively.

Fri, 11/21/2008 - 10:21

Or possibly an additional configuration option in spam assassin to include additional sa-update channels right in the webmin interface.

Wed, 03/04/2009 - 11:39 (Reply to #2)

Just saw this old message. I would be one of those who swear by dspam. What I find is this after running for years. dspam never gives me a false positive, never! However, rarely, it misses real spam.

So, we use a combo dspam and spamassassin system.

dspam is *very* good.

Topic locked