Hi there,
Actual ClamAV version on my server (CentOS 5.4) is 0.95.2, and I'm wondering if it's possible to update to 0.96... I don't know exactly what information is relevant for debugging this... Here's some info anyway :
# yum info clamav
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Reducing CentOS-5 Testing to included packages only
Finished
Installed Packages
Name : clamav
Arch : x86_64
Version : 0.95.2
Release : 1.vm.el5
Size : 1.8 M
Repo : installed
Summary : End-user tools for the Clam Antivirus scanner
URL : http://www.clamav.net
License : GPLv2
Description: Clam AntiVirus is an anti-virus toolkit for UNIX. The main purpose of this
: software is the integration with mail servers (attachment scanning). The
: package provides a flexible and scalable multi-threaded daemon, a command
: line scanner, and a tool for automatic updating via Internet. The programs
: are based on a shared library distributed with the Clam AntiVirus package,
: which you can use with your own software. The virus database is based on
: the virus database from OpenAntiVirus, but contains additional signatures
: (including signatures for popular polymorphic viruses, too) and is KEPT UP
: TO DATE.
and
# yum list available 'clamav*'
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Reducing CentOS-5 Testing to included packages only
Finished
Available Packages
clamav-data-empty.x86_64 0.95.2-1.vm.el5 virtualmin
clamav-devel.x86_64 0.95.2-1.vm.el5 virtualmin
clamav-milter.x86_64 0.95.2-1.vm.el5 virtualmin
clamav-milter-sysv.x86_64 0.95.2-1.vm.el5 virtualmin
Please help... :)
Bump. I really need something on this one. The package was installed by VM, so I doubt that de-installing then re-installing from another repo would do the trick. Please help !
I believe updating the CentOS ClamAV packages to 0.96 is on Joe's todo list. I unfortunately don't have an ETA, but it shouldn't be too long...
-Eric
oh, fine. I thought the package was from a VM repo ? Well, anyway, if it's on the way it's ok...