Submitted by mvander25 on Wed, 09/24/2014 - 19:35
My site just updated itself from 4.10 gpl to 4.11 pro
It says there was a package update to webmin, so I ran it, now it says I have pro ? Help...
Status:
Active
My site just updated itself from 4.10 gpl to 4.11 pro
It says there was a package update to webmin, so I ran it, now it says I have pro ? Help...
Comments
Submitted by mvander25 on Wed, 09/24/2014 - 19:52 Comment #1
The following packages will be upgraded: webmin-virtual-server 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 4143 kB of archives. After this operation, 22.6 GB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://software.virtualmin.com/gpl/ubuntu/ virtualmin-universal/main webmin-virtual-server all 4.11 [4143 kB] Fetched 4143 kB in 2s (1645 kB/s) (Reading database ... 273243 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../webmin-virtual-server_4.11_all.deb ... Unpacking webmin-virtual-server (4.11) over (4.10.gpl) ... Setting up webmin-virtual-server (4.11) ...
Submitted by andreychek on Wed, 09/24/2014 - 21:25 Comment #2
Howdy -- hmm, that's unusual! I wasn't able to reproduce the problem you're seeing when updating an Ubuntu system.
Where do you see it mentioning it's the "Pro" version?
Also, what output do you receive when running this command:
cat /etc/virtualmin-license
I may have accidentally run my GPL package copying script in the wrong directory. Looking into it.
Yep. Apologies for the inconvience.
It's fixed in the repo now, though we'll need to convince apt/dpkg to install the new GPL version over the incorrect Pro version (the Pro version will complain about license problems, so you will want to switch back).
Eric, is there a way to force apt-get to install a particular version of a package from the repos? I dunno how the version comparison works, but if the universal repo served out the Pro version over the GPL in this instance, I guess it somehow compares as newer than the GPL version (this seems weird as GPL version has "gpl" in the version section, which seems like it ought to compare as newer).