After upgrading from debiain 5 to 6 (32-bit), I was installing bonnie++ to do some i/o benchmarking. In the process I got prompted with this:
webhost3:/tmp# apt-get install bonnie++
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
apache2-suexec-custom libwnck-common xkb-data vbetool powermgmt-base hal kbd console-data pm-utils thunar-data xli console-common exo-utils radeontool
hal-info miscfiles libjpeg-progs xfdesktop4-data eject libnss3-1d
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
bonnie++
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 70.6 kB of archives.
After this operation, 221 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main bonnie++ i386 1.96 [70.6 kB]
Fetched 70.6 kB in 1s (52.6 kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package bonnie++.
(Reading database ... 117937 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking bonnie++ (from .../bonnie++_1.96_i386.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up bonnie++ (1.96) ...
webhost3:/tmp# apt-get autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
apache2-suexec-custom console-common console-data eject exo-utils hal hal-info kbd libjpeg-progs libnss3-1d libwnck-common miscfiles pm-utils
powermgmt-base radeontool thunar-data vbetool xfdesktop4-data xkb-data xli
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 20 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 45.6 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Unfortunately, I didn't read closely or research what the unneeded packages were. I just let it uninstall them. I spent the next 2-3 hours troubleshooting fcgi/suexec issues. Eventually found out that I needed your specific apache2-suexec-custom because you hard code it to run within /home. One forum suggested I can fix most virtualmin components by running:
apt-get install
Indeed this did put your packages back in. But is also reset some of my configs. My dovecot IMAP folder index file location setting got changed from ~/Maildir (default) to /var/lib/dovecot-virtualmin/..... Then users are calling me because their IMAP folders are no longer appearing in their email client. I fixed that by changing the settings back to ~/Maildir.
It also introduced some other issues that I had to troubleshoot that night with config files. Not fun. Overall probably took 2-3 hours & kept me up until 1-2am. :-)
So if you know (or can figure out) why apt-get would think your packages are no longer necessary & would offer/suggest to let it remove them (in lieu of the debian repo's versions), hopefully you can fix it so that you can save other users some heartache.
Thanks,
Doug
Comments
Submitted by JamieCameron on Fri, 06/29/2012 - 00:38 Comment #1
Virtualmin just installs
apache2-suexec-custom
as part of the install process - but it isn't a dependency of any other package, nor do I think it really needs to be. That said, I am not sure exactly how apt-get decides which packages are safe to remove..In a case like this, you would be able to fix the problem by running
apt-get install apache2-suexec-custom
Submitted by austinfwd on Tue, 07/03/2012 - 13:56 Comment #2
Thanks for the reply Jamie. I do think that I figured out that all I needed was to replace the stock apache2-suexec, with yours. Unfortunately I figured that out too late. I hope you don't have other users run into this problem. :-)
I would still consider this a bug. Obviously it was caused by apt-get and not virtualmin itself. But it broke virtualmin. In my opinion running apt-get on virtualmin servers is a normal process that has to be done for security updates, bug fixes, etc. Normally virtualmin handles this gracefully. But in this case it broke the machine. I would suggest that you look into whether you can prevent apt-get from being able to do this in the future.
With that said, I only have 1 other debian 5 box running virtualmin that I need to upgrade to 6. I'm sure I can take care of this issue myself if it becomes necessary in the future. So I don't think I'll be affected by it in the future. However, I think it it should be fixed if you are concerned about making this a smooth experience for us sysadmins. But hopefully most everyone is already upgraded by now since Lenny is EOL.
I'm not closing this ticket, but I don't mind if you do if you want.
Thanks again,
Doug